No Spin. Just The Source.
unga.news

Four Days Before the Midterms, a Biden Judge Orders Trump's '$5,000' Ad Pulled, Even From His Super PAC

Judge Jennifer Rochon ordered three White House videos, including Trump's promise of $5,000 per adult if Republicans hold Congress, taken off government sites and MAGA Inc.'s airwaves. The request came from a union, its PAC and a voter.

By @UngaTheGreat ·
Share on XText
Image: Video still: Donald J. Trump on X

Four days before Election Day, a federal judge in Manhattan has ordered President Trump's own White House to take down his promise of $5,000 for every adult.

U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon, a Biden appointee, ordered on Friday that the administration stop spreading three videos titled "$5,000 to Americans," "Every Democrat Voted Against No Tax on Tips" and "Cost of Socialism." The government must "immediately remove" them from official websites, "including social media sites such as YouTube, Instagram, or other similar sites."

She went further. The administration must also "cancel or cause to be cancelled" any arrangements for the ads to air through outside parties, "including airing of the advertisements by MAGA Inc.," the super PAC backing Trump. MAGA Inc. is not a party to the case. The order was entered at 3:20 p.m. and runs 14 days, past Tuesday's election.

Trump's Oct. 3 video from the Oval Office. The same lines, "If the Democrats win, you will have an economic depression" and "you will each have $5,000 in your pocket," are in the ad the judge ordered pulled. Video: Donald J. Trump on X

'Purely partisan'

Ruling from the bench after an emergency hearing, Rochon called the three ads "purely partisan," Courthouse News reported from the courtroom. She said she was "hard pressed" to see the $5,000 ad as anything other than a partisan pitch. "Voters are being directly asked to support one political party over another in an upcoming election," she said.

In the ad, Trump speaks from the Oval Office. "If the Democrats win, you will have an economic depression," he says. "If the Republicans win, you will each have $5,000 in your pocket." Trump first made that promise on X on Oct. 3, in a video posted to his account. "I look forward to signing those checks!" he wrote.

Rochon played one of the ads in open court and pressed the government's lawyer, Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Oestericher, to explain why it wasn't partisan. He argued it lawfully explained the president's policies. She disagreed.

Timeline: Sept. 20, 2026, CBP signs a 20 million dollar ad deal with LMD Agency for TV spots featuring Trump. Oct. 3, Trump posts his Oval Office video promising 5,000 dollars per adult if Republicans win. Oct. 11, Judge Rochon's first order stops the DHS-funded TV ads. Oct. 23, a union, its PAC and a voter ask her to expand the order to White House ads and MAGA Inc. Oct. 30 at 3:20 p.m., three ads ordered off government sites and MAGA Inc. Nov. 3, Election Day. The order runs 14 days.
From a DHS ad contract to Friday's order. Sources: S.D.N.Y. orders of Oct. 11 and Oct. 30, plaintiffs' Oct. 23 motion, Donald J. Trump on X. Chart: unga.news

Who asked for it

The case, Common Cause v. Department of Homeland Security, was filed by a coalition led by Common Cause. The motion to widen the order came from three of its plaintiffs: Service Employees International Union Local 32BJ, the union's political action committee, Empire State 32BJ SEIU PAC, and a voter, Robert Hunter. Their lawyers include Democracy Forward and Campaign Legal Center Action.

Rochon had already stopped the first round. On Oct. 11 she froze a $20 million plan, paid for with Homeland Security money, to air TV ads featuring Trump, including spots titled "Final Battle" and "Maduro." The unions then went after the White House's own online videos and the super PAC that aired them, pointing to the government's admission that White House staff helped produce them by "compil[ing]" them.

In a statement, Common Cause president Virginia Kase Solomón called the ads "an unlawful attempt to use public funds for partisan propaganda right in the middle of an election."

The White House: 'Lawless'

The administration told the court that the president's staff exist to do exactly this. "In serving the President, White House staff play an important role in helping educate the public regarding the President's positions, policies, and accomplishments," the Justice Department wrote in its Oct. 27 opposition. It also argued the court had no power over MAGA Inc., noting the super PAC "has not been named as a party to this case" and that "the Court may not order injunctive relief against the President."

"This Biden-appointed activist judge issued a lawless order to stop the administration from sharing patriotic videos," White House spokeswoman Lauren Bis said, according to the AP.

The plaintiffs had asked for at least 13 ads to come down. Rochon pulled three and left the rest up for now.

ShareShare on XText

Sources

  1. U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. — Common Cause v. DHS, No. 1:26-cv-08882 (JLR): Order granting in part motion to expand TRO, Dkt. 101 (Oct. 30, 2026)
  2. U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. — Plaintiffs' notice of motion to expand the temporary restraining order, Dkt. 81 (Oct. 23, 2026)
  3. U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. — Defendants' opposition to expanded TRO, Dkt. 86 (Oct. 27, 2026)
  4. U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y. — Order granting TRO and Section 705 stay, Dkt. 41 (Oct. 11, 2026)
  5. Donald J. Trump on X — $5,000 pledge video (Oct. 3, 2026)
  6. Courthouse News Service — Judge blocks 3 MAGA ads over concerns they breached taxpayer-funded propaganda law (Oct. 30, 2026)
  7. AP — Federal judge bans 3 Trump administration ads (Oct. 30, 2026)
← Back to unga.news